Hoosiers

Directed by: David Anspaugh

Written by: Angelo Pizzo

There aren't too many great basketball movies out there (sorry, Space Jam), but "Hoosiers" is by far the best. In fact, it's easily one of the most inspirational sports movies, regardless of the sport. (As a brief aside, "Hoop Dreams" takes a close and very honorable second place.)

A former college coach (Hackman) with a violent past takes over the basketball program at a high school in small-town Indiana. Not everyone in town takes to his less-than-traditional style of coaching, but with the help of another teacher (Hershey), he manages to earn the loyalty of the best player in town. The long road to the championship isn't easy, though.

I've spent a lot of time thinking about what this movie does right, and trying to narrow it beyond "just about everything." What stands out most is just how real everything in the movie feels - especially the characters. Aside from a few moments of dialogue, nothing feels forced or contrived. It seemed like real people would make these real comments when faced with these real situations. Even the romance subplot, usually the downfall of most movies, plays out in a very natural and unforced fashion. Dennis Hopper, playing the alcoholic assistant coach, even earned an Academy Award nomination for his performance.

The movie is a bit slow at first. It takes a long time to meet the final cast of characters. But it is totally worth the wait. The slow development is an element of the style of the film, not a flaw in the pacing. The film gives us enough time to reflect on the characters and events, which is key in a film where reflection on life is such an important theme.

I won't spend time here describing how Hackman's character is an unlikely amalgam of the great John Wooden and the infamous Bobby Knight. Suffice to say that Hackman balances the virtues of Wooden's coaching with the intensity (borderline fury) of Knight's style. It makes him a rich, full character, who you find yourself rooting for even after you know about why he was dismissed from the college position.

This is a film worth seeing. I highly recommend it, especially now as the shadows of "March Madness" begin to creep in on the edges of our national consciousness.

Moneyball

Directed by: Bennett Miller

Written by: Steven Zaillian (screenplay), Aaron Sorkin (screenplay), Stan Chervin (story), Michael Lewis (book)

Michael Lewis's book "Moneyball" shook up the traditional understanding of baseball by introducing the general population to the hard statistical analysis of the game known as "sabermetrics." The narrative focuses on the Oakland Athletics general manager Billy Beane and his attempt to build a winning team on a limited budget using sabermetrics to identify undervalued players.

The movie "Moneyball" takes the Billy Beane narrative from the book, but abandons essentially all of the history and evolution of baseball statistics. Unfortunately, this leaves "inside references" in the film that only those who have read the book will understand, leaving anyone else to scratch their head and wonder what the characters were talking about. (The most notable example are numerous references to Bill James - the father of sabermetrics - who received significant attention in the book, but is only occasionally referenced.)

This movie came with a lot of baggage, including the epic timeline it took to get produced. From when it was originally announced, directors and actors came and went on a carousel. At one point, Paul DePodesta - a major figure in the book - asked that his name be removed from the film, so the character's name was changed to Peter Brand.

Much of the buzz surrounding the film originally was about Brad Pitt's performance. I have to say he's good, but hard to tell whether Brad Pitt's acting was actually good, or whether he's just playing the same character over and over again. I'm not willing to jump on the Oscar bandwagon for this one, though it's definitely worth an honorable mention. The trade deadline scene is fantastic, though, and may be the key in getting him nominated.

What made the book great was the balance of Billy Beane's personal story and the rise of sabermetric analysis in baseball. Although the film is good, the limited scope removed much of the context. I found myself having to explain several concepts to my wife after the movie - not because she is clueless, but because the movie left them unexplained.

This movie is good, but unless you're a hardcore baseball stat geek, you may need to just roll with the punches at a few points.